Hefty fines for companies not following opt in SMS messaging policies
Last week, in my Can you send anyone a text message? post I talked about the best practices of getting a documented opt in before sending a SMS marketing message. After that post went live, there was an announcement in the US that the large telecommunications company Sprint was fined for violating the US regulations against spam texting. Not being able to resist such a great example of what not to do, I decided to share some of the details of the Sprint case as well as a UK example to prove the point.
The US Federal Communications Commission fined Sprint $7.5 million (£4.4 million) for sending text messages to those who had requested not to receive them. The people Sprint contacted had specifically opted out of receiving messages. The fine is so large because this isn’t Sprint’s first offence. Back in 2011 the company paid $400,000 ( £237k) in a settlement over similar complaints.
After this latest incident, Sprint is also required to create a compliance program and report regularly to the FCC to ensure there are no more violations for a period of two years.
It’s pretty clear the company wasn’t trying to violate anyone’s privacy or right to refuse communications. They certainly were at fault, but the error was in their processes and software used for compliance. The new compliance program they are creating should solve their problems (or they’ll be in bigger trouble next time).
That isn’t always the case though. Sometimes companies are operating with dubious intentions. That is, they knowingly spam people with text messages. At least it appears that way.
Last December First Financial (UK) Limited was issued a monetary penalty by the Information Commissioner of the Privacy and Electronic Communications. First Financial hadn’t been registered very long, didn’t completely fill out their company records, and sent text messages to over 4000 people that never requested them. In fact, the full Monetary Penalty Notice asserts that the company operated using unregistered SIM cards in an attempt to circumvent spam filters (a well known practice to those who attempt to avoid regulations). The text messages were designed to appear as if they were from friends, or people they knew, with links encouraging the receiver to apply for loans. In addition to being deceptive in nature, the messages were sent at odd hours of the day disrupting the recipients and causing distress for many.
Given the nature of the business , the number of complaints received, along with a list of other criteria, the Information Commissioner imposed a fine of £175k. It seems clear their intent was to violate the law until they were caught. The First Financial websites referred to in the complaint are no longer active.
As these two examples show, violations of the opt in requirement can be inadvertent or deliberate. Inadvertent violations can stem from being unaware of the regulations, or errors in process such as with Sprint. To avoid this type of problem you need to ensure a clear, documented opt in process for your company. And also be sure to honour those who opt out according to the process you put in place.
While the fines are expensive, the customer relations issue resulting from texting those who don’t opt in could be even more costly. At least if you’re a reputable company working hard for your customers business.
Sprint is a large company and probably won’t see any impact at all from the most recent fine (other than the improvement in their internal processes). In the States it wasn’t big news, just another headline among many.
But for smaller businesses the loss could be much greater, and perhaps financially crippling. So just remember the answer to the question, “Can I text anyone marketing messages?” is a resounding no if you don’t have their express permission.
Mobile marketing offers an unprecedented access to your customers virtually any time, anywhere. This is particularly true for SMS marketing because it is “always on”. Customers don’t have to be surfing the web, or using an app to receive messages. Instead, they see the marketing messages right alongside ones from their friends and family.
SMS spam is a problem worldwide. But in the UK, we’re less likely to get it than many other countries. Find out why that is, see some examples, and how you can do your part to keep your SMS messages free of spam.
Starting an SMS marketing campaign can be a daunting task. Gathering explicit opt ins can take time, as you need to make an investment in advertising. So why not just get a jumpstart and buy a list of mobile numbers from an organisation that already has the opt ins? You could do that, but it’s probably harder than just getting people to opt in on their own. Here’s why.
Is SMS marketing the worst idea ever? That’s the opinion of one author in Entrepreneur Magazine. He gives five reasons why companies should never bother sending SMS messages to customers. I take him on, point by point to show why he’s wrong and SMS marketing is the best idea ever.
Does the thought of cold calling fill you with dread? You might think it would be easier to use SMS messaging instead. And though it’s legal to do so in some circumstances, you might want to rethink using it that way. Read the full blog to find out why.
The UK may be leaving the EU, but the GDPR is still coming. Find out what it means for your business, and your SMS messaging, in our post that looks ahead and reviews the ICO guidance to prepare for the new rules.
When conducting an SMS marketing campaign, there are a number of compliance regulations you should be aware of, to ensure that your communications are as effective as possible, without being potentially damaging to your campaign or your business. If you're marketing to a UK market, the UK Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) gives clear guidelines on what falls within the rules. Here we've highlighted some key tips to ensure your next campaign is compliant, based on common questions that arise.
One of the major metrics in SMS marketing is how many people opt in to receive your messages. But there’s a flip side to that metric: how many people opt out. In the ideal world, no one would ever leave your list and instead continue to make purchases or support your organisation for as long as you decide to message them.
In last week’s blog I covered how the Trump campaign sent unsolicited SMS messages to voters. This week I’m stuck on the same topic, but from a totally different angle: what we can learn from that failure. Because honestly, their biggest issue might not be violating the law. It might be the people they have writing their SMS messages. It’s time to dissect the message that spawned the law suit, and learn what we can from it.
The PECR Regulations, better known as the Privacy and Electronics Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 are one of the most important pieces of legislation affecting those involved in SMS Marketing. They exist to safeguard the privacy and use of personal information when used for direct marketing through electronic means, including communications by SMS. Parts of it crossover with the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and where it does so, both pieces of legislation should be complied with. Unlike the DPA, the PECR is obligatory whether or not you process personal data in the course of your business. Read this essential guide to PECR for SMS Marketing to ensure you know everything you need to know.