Hefty fines for companies not following opt in SMS messaging policies
Last week, in my Can you send anyone a text message? post I talked about the best practices of getting a documented opt in before sending a SMS marketing message. After that post went live, there was an announcement in the US that the large telecommunications company Sprint was fined for violating the US regulations against spam texting. Not being able to resist such a great example of what not to do, I decided to share some of the details of the Sprint case as well as a UK example to prove the point.
The US Federal Communications Commission fined Sprint $7.5 million (£4.4 million) for sending text messages to those who had requested not to receive them. The people Sprint contacted had specifically opted out of receiving messages. The fine is so large because this isn’t Sprint’s first offence. Back in 2011 the company paid $400,000 ( £237k) in a settlement over similar complaints.
After this latest incident, Sprint is also required to create a compliance program and report regularly to the FCC to ensure there are no more violations for a period of two years.
It’s pretty clear the company wasn’t trying to violate anyone’s privacy or right to refuse communications. They certainly were at fault, but the error was in their processes and software used for compliance. The new compliance program they are creating should solve their problems (or they’ll be in bigger trouble next time).
That isn’t always the case though. Sometimes companies are operating with dubious intentions. That is, they knowingly spam people with text messages. At least it appears that way.
Last December First Financial (UK) Limited was issued a monetary penalty by the Information Commissioner of the Privacy and Electronic Communications. First Financial hadn’t been registered very long, didn’t completely fill out their company records, and sent text messages to over 4000 people that never requested them. In fact, the full Monetary Penalty Notice asserts that the company operated using unregistered SIM cards in an attempt to circumvent spam filters (a well known practice to those who attempt to avoid regulations). The text messages were designed to appear as if they were from friends, or people they knew, with links encouraging the receiver to apply for loans. In addition to being deceptive in nature, the messages were sent at odd hours of the day disrupting the recipients and causing distress for many.
Given the nature of the business , the number of complaints received, along with a list of other criteria, the Information Commissioner imposed a fine of £175k. It seems clear their intent was to violate the law until they were caught. The First Financial websites referred to in the complaint are no longer active.
As these two examples show, violations of the opt in requirement can be inadvertent or deliberate. Inadvertent violations can stem from being unaware of the regulations, or errors in process such as with Sprint. To avoid this type of problem you need to ensure a clear, documented opt in process for your company. And also be sure to honour those who opt out according to the process you put in place.
While the fines are expensive, the customer relations issue resulting from texting those who don’t opt in could be even more costly. At least if you’re a reputable company working hard for your customers business.
Sprint is a large company and probably won’t see any impact at all from the most recent fine (other than the improvement in their internal processes). In the States it wasn’t big news, just another headline among many.
But for smaller businesses the loss could be much greater, and perhaps financially crippling. So just remember the answer to the question, “Can I text anyone marketing messages?” is a resounding no if you don’t have their express permission.
Related Articles
Unsolicited SMS Messages Lead to Trouble…Even for Trump
Late last month reports surfaced that the Trump US presidential campaign had sent unsolicited SMS messages to voters in the Chicago area. One man, Joshua Thorne, and his lawyers have filed a class-action lawsuit alleging the Trump Campaign violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA, the US equivalent of the PECR).
Advantages & Disadvantages of SMS Marketing
SMS marketing is very different to most other more traditional marketing tools, specifically because of its short-form, text only nature. This certainly shouldn't put you off though. We have put together our guide to both the best things about SMS marketing and some of the potential problems, and how to work around them.
Why SMS Marketing is Superior to Email for Entrepreneurs
As an entrepreneur, it is notoriously difficult to get your message out there. It's even harder to get seen and heard in a meaningful way that doesn't offend people. Email marketing has been the darling of entrepreneurs for years, but it's time for something new. Something that supersedes the email and circumvents the spam folder.
Best Practices for SMS Marketing
In many of our previous posts, we have discussed the whys and hows of SMS marketing, listing the benefits, and the impacts on lead generation. There’s no doubt that by employing a marketing strategy that uses business SMS as a medium that your processes will become more efficient and your leads will become more targeted, meaning a better ROI. Here we will look at the best practices for SMS marketing to ensure your campaigns are offering the best for you and your users.
A Demonstration on How Not to Build Your SMS List
Over the last month or so I've signed up for quite a lot of webinars. I'm always trying to learn more about technology, marketing, best practices – you get the idea. So I've been excited to see many organisations offering SMS reminders for webinars. But there is one experience I had with an SMS reminder for a webinar that I simply had to share.
![SMS Marketing GDPR Compliance [Infographic]](https://dox4euoyzny9u.cloudfront.net/images/fastsms/SMS-Marketing-GDPR.png)
5 Ways To Ensure Your SMS Marketing is GDPR Compliant – [Infographic]
SMS Marketing – Should You Buy a List?
Starting an SMS marketing campaign can be a daunting task. Gathering explicit opt ins can take time, as you need to make an investment in advertising. So why not just get a jumpstart and buy a list of mobile numbers from an organisation that already has the opt ins? You could do that, but it’s probably harder than just getting people to opt in on their own. Here’s why.
SMS Marketing: An Essential Guide to PECR
The PECR Regulations, better known as the Privacy and Electronics Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 are one of the most important pieces of legislation affecting those involved in SMS Marketing. They exist to safeguard the privacy and use of personal information when used for direct marketing through electronic means, including communications by SMS. Parts of it crossover with the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and where it does so, both pieces of legislation should be complied with. Unlike the DPA, the PECR is obligatory whether or not you process personal data in the course of your business. Read this essential guide to PECR for SMS Marketing to ensure you know everything you need to know.
What You Can Learn From a Bad SMS Message
In last week’s blog I covered how the Trump campaign sent unsolicited SMS messages to voters. This week I’m stuck on the same topic, but from a totally different angle: what we can learn from that failure. Because honestly, their biggest issue might not be violating the law. It might be the people they have writing their SMS messages. It’s time to dissect the message that spawned the law suit, and learn what we can from it.
SMS Opt-In: Why You Want It and How To Get It
The first thing to remember is that legally, you must give the customer the chance to both opt-in and opt-out of your SMS campaign - but the good news is people are happy to opt-in - 49% of them according to a 2014 survey. So all you need to do is stay compliant and follow some basic guidelines to grow your list.