Why you need to stick to your SMS marketing message limit
When someone signs up to your SMS marketing list, do you tell them how many messages you’ll send them? SMS best practices indicate that you should let them know either in an SMS message confirming their opt in or elsewhere on the materials they see when signing up. It sometimes looks like this:
Thanks for signing up! We’ll send a max of 5 msgs/mo. Msg&Data rates may apply. Questions? Reply HELP.
That message is like a promise. The person signed up agreeing to 5 SMS messages per month from you and that’s it. But is it really a big deal if you send more than 5? It might be.
Victoria's Secret is in trouble
Recently, the famous lingerie brand Victoria Secret has been charged with violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), roughly the US equivalent of the EC directive. A man signed up in May of 2015 to receive offers from the brand which promised no more than five per month. In November of 2015, he claims he received 97 SMS marketing messages, all on the same day.
No matter how you look at it, 97 is much larger than five, especially if the messages all came on the same day. When I first saw the case, I assumed that perhaps the company had gotten a bit too enthusiastic in its promotions leading up to Black Friday. Given the facts though, they may have had some technical glitch that caused the issue. But so far Victoria’s Secret is remaining silent on the event, indicating they won’t comment on active litigation.
According to an article on Mobile Marketing Watch, “The lawsuit does not indicate if all the messages were identical, but the complaint does say that the messages all contained ‘a generic non-personalized advertisement.'” I think that means the chances of either human error, or a technical glitch, is very likely.
They lose either way
US law governing spam and what people can do about is much different than the UK. The lawyers for the man have filed to make the case a class action lawsuit. This means that everyone on the Victoria’s Secret list that received those messages can now claim to be a victim (assuming the case is granted class action).
The one thing that’s pretty certain is that the company will eventually settle a class action lawsuit – even if they claim no wrongdoing. It will cost them millions, most of which will go to the lawyers on either side (It’s generally cheaper to settle than to try and win a case). The individuals in the class action may get some small compensation in the form of discounts or money.
This may happen regardless of why the messages were sent, or who takes the blame in the end (third party marketing company, employee, or the company).
In addition, the TCPA may fine the company if they determine that people did not consent to receive these extra messages. This is the first case in the US where someone who already opted in, actually acknowledges he gave permission, has then filed against a company for exceeding the stated amount of messages he agreed to initially. How the case will be handled is something everyone is watching (if you send messages to the US, you should be too!). Will they be held accountable even if it was a glitch that happened beyond their control? What if it’s as simple as an employee typing in the wrong information into a scheduler? Whatever the decision, the investigation may cost them subscribers and certainly will require some work to rebuild their marketing reputation.
What to do in your marketing
I couldn’t find any similar complaints with the ICO in the UK. Most of the cases seem to be clearly spam due to the number of complaints they receive. I can’t even guess how a similar situation in the UK would be handled by the ICO (though I do think they’d investigate if they had enough complaints).
The best way to avoid finding out what would happen, is to make sure you stick to the number of messages you said you’d send. Put processes in place to ensure there are no typos, or other human error that might lead to excessive messaging that will anger your list.
Does the thought of cold calling fill you with dread? You might think it would be easier to use SMS messaging instead. And though it’s legal to do so in some circumstances, you might want to rethink using it that way. Read the full blog to find out why.
The first thing to remember is that legally, you must give the customer the chance to both opt-in and opt-out of your SMS campaign - but the good news is people are happy to opt-in - 49% of them according to a 2014 survey. So all you need to do is stay compliant and follow some basic guidelines to grow your list.
SMS spam is a problem worldwide. But in the UK, we’re less likely to get it than many other countries. Find out why that is, see some examples, and how you can do your part to keep your SMS messages free of spam.
As an entrepreneur, it is notoriously difficult to get your message out there. It's even harder to get seen and heard in a meaningful way that doesn't offend people. Email marketing has been the darling of entrepreneurs for years, but it's time for something new. Something that supersedes the email and circumvents the spam folder.
Starting an SMS marketing campaign can be a daunting task. Gathering explicit opt ins can take time, as you need to make an investment in advertising. So why not just get a jumpstart and buy a list of mobile numbers from an organisation that already has the opt ins? You could do that, but it’s probably harder than just getting people to opt in on their own. Here’s why.
Any UK business that collects, stores and uses other people’s personal data for purposes such as marketing and selling is subject to the rules of the Data Protection Act, and those using SMS marketing are no exception. Having a basic understanding of the DPA legislation and its main requirements is useful to maintain best practice in direct marketing such as SMS marketing and also helps to uphold your hard won customer trust - as well as avoid the potentially costly consequences of falling foul of the law. Read this article to learn how to avoid the simple pitfalls and get your SMS marketing campaign off to the right start.
Late last month reports surfaced that the Trump US presidential campaign had sent unsolicited SMS messages to voters in the Chicago area. One man, Joshua Thorne, and his lawyers have filed a class-action lawsuit alleging the Trump Campaign violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA, the US equivalent of the PECR).